Phenanthroline polyazamacrocycles as G-quadruplex DNA binders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Targeting quadruplex DNA structures with small molecules is a promising strategy for anti-cancer drug design. Four phenanthroline polyazamacrocycles were studied for their binding affinity, thermal stabilization, inhibitory effect on the activity of helicase towards human telomeric 22AG and oncogene promoter c-MYC G-quadruplexes (G4s), and their ability to inhibit Taq polymerase-mediated DNA extension. The fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) melting assay indicates that the melting temperature increases (ΔTm values) of c-MYC and 22AG G4s are 17.2 and 20.3 °C, respectively, for the ligand [32]phen2N4 followed by [16]phenN4 (11.3 and 15.0 °C, for c-MYC and 22AG, respectively). Competitive FRET assays show that [32]phen2N4 and [16]phenN4 exhibit G4 selectivity over duplex DNA. Different G4s were compared; no considerable selectivity of the ligands for a specific G4 was found. Circular dichroism (CD) confirms the formation of G4 structures and the melting experiments show that [16]phenN4 and [32]phen2N4 are the most stabilizing ligands with a ΔTm of 19.3 °C and 15.1 °C, respectively, at 5 molar equivalents for the c-MYC G4. The fluorescent intercalator displacement (FID) assay also demonstrates that ligand [32]phen2N4 furnishes very low DC50 values (0.87-1.24 μM), indicating high stabilization of c-MYC and 22AG G4s. These results suggest that the hexyl chain in these compounds plays an important role in regulating the stabilization of these G4s. Binding constants, determined by fluorescence titrations, indicate a moderate ligand-G4 binding with KSV between 105 and 106 M-1 in which [16]phenN4 has a slightly higher apparent binding constant for telomeric 22AG G4 than that for the c-MYC G4. The ligand's ability to inhibit Taq polymerase confirms the biological activity of [16]phenN4 and [32]phen2N4 against the c-MYC G4. In addition, ligands [32]phen2N4 and [16]phenN4 affect the unwinding activity of Pif1 in the presence of DNA systems harboring c-MYC and telomeric G4 motifs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".