In situ evaluation of performance of reclamation measures implemented on abandoned reactive tailings disposal site
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The abandoned Manitou mine site produced acid mine drainage for decades. One of the site’s tailings storage facilities (TSF 2) was reclaimed in 2009 using an elevated water table combined with a monolayer cover made of low-sulphur tailings. A field investigation was undertaken from 2012 to 2015 to verify the performance of the reclamation technique in stemming the production of contaminants. This verification is based on two main criteria, i.e., the minimum water table level and maximum oxygen flux reaching the Manitou tailings. Thirteen monitoring stations were installed in TSF 2. The hydrogeological behavior and oxygen migration were investigated at each station by measuring volumetric water content, suction, water table level, gaseous pore oxygen concentration, and oxygen consumption. Analyses of field data showed that the minimum water table level criterion was reached with the exception of a portion of TSF 2 during the summer months. Oxygen fluxes reaching the Manitou tailings were determined using numerical simulations and analytical solutions; their yearly mean was many times lower than maximum targets generally used on reclaimed tailings disposal areas. The current system met the targeted performance criteria over the studied period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".