MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2793577509 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.304

A304 A CASE REPORT ILLUSTRATING THE NATURAL PROGRESSION OF TYPE 3 TO TYPE 2 ACHALASIA

2018· article· en· W2793577509 on OpenAlexaff
Ann T., L W Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAchalasiaHigh resolution manometryDysphagiaMedicinePeristalsisMyenteric plexusSwallowingGastroenterologyEsophageal motility disorderEsophagusInternal medicineSpasticSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Achalasia is characterized by the loss of esophageal peristalsis and impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. The pathophysiology of this disease is thought to be related to the progressive loss of nitrergic inhibitory innervation in the esophagus. This hypothesis is supported by histological studies in patients diagnosed with achalasia, in whom there is a decrease of neurons containing nitric oxide synthase and interstitial cells of Cajal, a unit that likely modulates nitrergic nerve response. With the advent of high resolution esophageal manometry study (EMS) and subsequent increase in diagnostic precision, achalasia is now readily subdivided into types 1, 2 and 3. Given that the normal physiology of esophageal peristalsis and LES relaxation is dependent on nitrergic innervation, it has been hypothesized that achalasia naturally progresses from spastic type 3, to pan-pressurization seen in type 2 and finally to loss of esophageal pressurization in advanced type 1 achalasia. To date, there is no demonstrable longitudinal data supporting this hypothesis of disease progression. The aim of this case report is to describe novel observations that support the hypothesis of achalasia progression. We identified and reviewed the high resolution esophageal manometry studies of a patient who demonstrated a change in achalasia subtypes. We report a case of a previously healthy 60-year-old male who presented with dysphagia and was later diagnosed with type 3 achalasia by high resolution EMS (Figure 1a). He underwent two pneumatic dilatations without any significant clinical improvement of his dysphagia. Two years later, a repeat EMS demonstrated type 2 achalasia (Figure 1b). This is the first longitudinal clinical case that demonstrates the progression from type 3 to type 2 achalasia. This novel case observation strengthens our current understanding of achalasia, which involves loss of nitrergic inhibitory nerves, with progression from spastic type 3 esophageal aperistalsis to pan-esophageal type 2 pressurization. Figure 1 None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments→French-language works237,207→