MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2793588309 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.279

A279 COLONIZATION WITH PROTEOLYTIC BACTERIA INDUCES LOW-GRADE INFLAMMATION AND BARRIER DYSFUNCTION IN MICE

2018· article· en· W2793588309 on OpenAlexaff
Heather J. Galipeau, Jasmine Dong, A Caminero Fernandez, Miriam Bermúdez-Brito, Jennifer Jury, Giada De Palma, Alexandra Clarizio, Cristiane Duque, Přemysl Berčík, E Verdu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProteasesMicrobiologyBiologyProteolytic enzymesColitisNeutrophil elastaseImmunityProteaseImmunologyInflammationImmune systemEnzymeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the gastrointestinal tract, proteases regulate motility, immunity, mucus cleavage, wound healing and tissue remodeling. A proteolytic imbalance has been described in inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome and celiac disease, but it is unclear if this imbalance is an initiator or consequence of disease. Most studies focus on host-derived proteases, while the role of bacterial proteases are poorly understood. We investigated the effects induced by microbial derived proteases on host immunity and physiology, after gnotobiotic colonization of mice with bacterial strains with either high or low proteolytic activity. Bacterial strains for colonization were isolated from two symptomatic patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Strains with high proteolytic activity (HPA) or low-proteolytic activity (LPA) were selected based on in vitro proteolytic screening of the individual strains to generate two communities. The HPA community consisted of Clostridium perfringens METW, Pseudomonas aeruginosa C4, Enteroccocus faecalis FAAJ, and Bacteroides fragilis BHI A, and the LPA community was comprised of Escherichia coli K2 aer., Ruminococcus gnavus D5FAA1, Enterococcus faecium CNAG, and Streptococcus salivarius CAN K2. Adult germ-free C57BL/6 mice were colonized with the HPA or LPA community for three weeks, after which fecal proteolytic activity and the effects on host barrier function and immunity were determined. Mice colonized with the HPA had higher overall proteolytic activity, elastase activity, and gelatinase activity in fecal samples than LPA-colonized mice (p<0.001). Increased serum LPS was observed in HPA-colonized mice compared to LPA-colonized mice (p<0.05), and more HPA-colonized mice had translocation of live bacteria to the spleen (p=0.07), but no differences in colonic 51Cr-EDTA flux were detected. Using nanostring technology, we probed the colonic expression of various immune and barrier related genes. HPA-colonized mice had upregulated Lyz1, Hif1a, Cdh1, Tjp1, and Ttf3 expression compared to LPA-colonized mice (p<0.05). In addition, higher CD11b (p<0.01), CCR2, and IL-22ra2 (p<0.05) was detected in HPA-colonized mice. Quantification of polymorphonuclear cells in colonic H&E sections revealed greater inflammatory infiltrate in HPA-colonized mice (p<0.001). Finally, levels of β-defensin were increased in the feces of HPA-colonized, as measured by ELISA (p<0.05). We successfully established an in vivo mouse model of microbial proteolytic imbalance. Colonization with a high proteolytic microbiota induces low-grade inflammation and an altered barrier that may contribute to the onset of gut inflammatory disorders. CCC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicProbiotics and Fermented Foods→French-language works237,207→