MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793657974 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.213

A213 DETERMINING TRANSITION READINESS IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (TREAD-IBD): A MULTI-CENTRE CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY

2018· article· en· W2793657974 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alice Foster, Brian Bressler, Matthew Carroll, Jennifer deBruyn, Nancy Fu, Hien Q. Huynh, Karen I. Kroeker, Sally Lawrence, Cynthia H. Seow, Eytan Wine, Kevan Jacobson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialMedicineAnxietyInflammatory bowel diseaseDepression (economics)Cross-sectional studyPopulationPsychiatryIrritable bowel syndromeDiseasePatient Health QuestionnaireFamily medicineClinical psychologyInternal medicineDepressive symptoms

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transitioning inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients from pediatric to adult care is a challenging and complex process. Knowledge of the potential factors influencing transition readiness is limited, especially in this unique population. To evaluate potential factors including patient and parent psychosocial wellbeing, self-management, self-advocacy skills and geographical location of medical care, and to explore their effects on transition readiness in patients with IBD. An ongoing cross-sectional multicentre study evaluating transition readiness in IBD patients 16 to 19 years of age who have been enrolled from pediatric and adult gastroenterology clinics in Western Canada (Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton and Winnipeg). Questionnaires include the OnTRAC Readiness Assessment Questionnaire, the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED), the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) to screen for depression and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) to screen for parental anxiety. The patient, parent and physician also score the child and parent’s readiness to transition on a scale of 1–10 (1=not ready and 10=completely ready). To date, 31 patients have been enrolled from participating Vancouver sites, 24 with Crohn’s disease, 4 with ulcerative colitis and 3 with indeterminate colitis. Questionnaires indicated scores consistent with an anxiety disorder in 38% of those with IBD (only 20% of parents suggested anxiety in their child), and mild to severe depression in 23% of those with IBD. In addition, 24% of the parents themselves had GAD-7 scores consistent with mild to severe anxiety. Patients reported a mean readiness to transition score of 7.4. The physicians’ evaluations of readiness to transition was similar to the patient group (mean 7), while the parent group gave a lower score (mean 5.8). Indeed, 77% of patients never or rarely saw the physician on their own at visits, 59% of parents indicated that they call the healthcare team with disease-related questions or concerns for their child and 46% of patients need reminders from parents to take medications. Survey data from initial recruited patients suggest that a large proportion of transitioning youth continue to have behaviours that reflect a lack of self-advocacy and independence. In addition, depression and anxiety scores are high in this population which could impact the level of preparation for transition to adult care. Further data will be collected in this ongoing multi-centre study to assess the impact of youth and parental factors on transition readiness and to evaluate possible site to site variability. Janssen Pharmaceuticals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207