MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793779891 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1720871115

Expansions, diversification, and interindividual copy number variations of AID/APOBEC family cytidine deaminase genes in lampreys

2018· article· en· W2793779891 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephen J. Holland, Lesley Berghuis, Justin J. King, Lakshminarayan M. Iyer, Katarzyna Sikora, Heather Fifield, Sarah Peter, Emma M. Quinlan, Fumiaki Sugahara, Prashant Shingate, Inês Trancoso, Norimasa Iwanami, Е. Н. Темерева, Christine Strohmeier, Shigeru Kuratani, Byrappa Venkatesh, Guillaume Evanno, L. Aravind, Michael Schorpp, Mani Larijani, Thomas Boehm

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAquaculture disease management and microbiota
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersFP7 Ideas: European Research CouncilInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueU.S. National Library of MedicineDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMax-Planck-GesellschaftCanadian Cancer SocietyCanadian HIV Trials Network, Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAPOBECCytidine deaminaseBiologyGeneticsCytidineGeneActivation-induced (cytidine) deaminaseSomatic hypermutationGenomeBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Cytidine deaminases of the AID/APOBEC family mutate the genetic material of pathogens or contribute to the generation and diversification of antibody repertoires in jawed vertebrates. In the extant jawless vertebrate, the lamprey, two members of the AID/APOBEC family are implicated in the somatic diversification of variable lymphocyte receptor (VLR) repertoires. We discovered an unexpected diversity of cytidine deaminase genes within and among lamprey species. The cytidine deaminases with features comparable to jawed vertebrate AID are always present, suggesting that they are involved in essential processes, such as VLR assembly. In contrast, other genes show a remarkable copy number variation, like the APOBEC3 genes in mammals. This suggests an unexpected similarity in functional deployment of AID/APOBEC cytidine deaminases across all vertebrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicAquaculture disease management and microbiotaFrench-language works237,207