MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2793852026 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.146

A146 DIETARY INTAKE OF PATIENTS WITH CROHN’S DISEASE IN REMISSION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

2018· article· en· W2793852026 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lorian Taylor, Abdulelah Almutairdi, Raylene A. Reimer, Karen Madsen, Subrata Ghosh, Remo Panaccione, Nusrat Shommu, Richard Fedorak, Maitreyi Raman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicronutrientMedicineDietary Reference IntakeFood groupCalorieVitaminCross-sectional studyCohortInternal medicineNutrientEnvironmental healthBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly Crohn’s disease (CD) suffer from macro- and micronutrient deficiencies and do not meet current evidence-based guidelines for dietary intake. The intake patterns of these patients have not been well documented. To describe the (a) macro- and micronutrient intake and (b) dietary servings of red meat, poultry, fish, fruits, vegetables and probiotic containing foods in a cohort of patients with CD in remission from a single tertiary care center. Adult CD patients in endoscopic and clinical remission with ileal or ileocolonic disease were recruited prospectively at the University of Calgary. Patients completed a detailed 3-day food diary, which was reviewed with the patient by a registered dietitian (RD). Nutrient analysis was completed using ESHA, a nutrition analysis program. Research ethics board approval was obtained. Fifty-nine patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were consecutively recruited (27 males and 32 females). The mean intake of nutrients, servings of meat, fruit and vegetables, and probiotics were calculated for each gender and compared to dietary reference intakes (DRI) and Canada’s Food Guidelines (CFG) for healthy populations. The mean total calories, carbohydrates, fat, and fiber intake did not meet DRI (68%, 58%, 85% and 50%) respectively. Protein mean intake was high with males and females consuming 168% and 150% of their DRI respectively. Apart from the micronutrients, vitamins D, E, K, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and folate, the mean intake of the remaining vitamins was close to the DRI for both genders. Vitamin D mean intake was the lowest among the vitamins, with patients consuming less than 20% of the DRI in both genders. Servings of fruits and vegetables per day was low, 50% of the recommended daily servings as per the CFG in our study population. Mean weekly red meat servings were six, (600grams/week). No study patients ingested probiotic-containing foods. Even among patients in clinical and endoscopic remission, patients with Crohn’s disease have inadequate dietary intake and decreased dietary diversity. The impact on the natural history of disease is unknown. However, patient-centered dietary counseling would likely be beneficial in this patient population. Broad Foundation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→