MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793909870 · doi:10.1093/forestry/cpy010

Use of constructed coarse woody debris corridors in a clearcut by American martens (Martes americana) and their prey

2018· article· en· W2793909870 on OpenAlexafffund
Caroline R Seip, Dexter P. Hodder, Shannon M. Crowley, Chris J. Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueForestry An International Journal of Forest Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Northern British Columbia
KeywordsMartenCoarse woody debrisHabitatPredationEcologySnagGeographyEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

American martens (Martes americana) are typically associated with mature coniferous forests because they provide overhead cover and coarse woody debris (CWD) that martens require for protection and hunting. Therefore, clearcuts are considered poor marten habitat because they contain no overhead cover and relatively little CWD. We examined the efficacy of retaining CWD and constructing CWD corridors in a recently harvested clearcut to promote the use of the area by martens and small mammals, a major prey resource. We installed remote cameras in corridors, the surrounding clearcut and forest to monitor the distribution of martens and small mammals. Martens and red squirrels did not use CWD corridors more frequently than clearcut areas in summer; forest-floor small mammals, however, used corridors approximately three times as frequently as other habitats (x2 = 13.374, P = 0.001). Marten presence was positively associated with mature, dense forest and long pieces of CWD. In winter, red squirrels used corridors more frequently than other clearcut areas, and limited data suggested that martens preferred the corridors to other clearcut areas. Consequently, we recommend that forest managers retain CWD and construct CWD corridors within clearcuts to provide small mammal habitat, and to enhance marten habitat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForestry An International Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicForest Ecology and Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207