MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793953408 · doi:10.1097/rhu.0000000000000715

Can Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Help Guide Systemic Sclerosis Chronic Disease Care?

2018· article· en· W2793953408 on OpenAlexaff
Tracy Frech, Rachel Hess, Joshua Biber, Jeffrey Young, Alexander Hardman, Howard Weeks, Kathryn A. Peterson, Mary Beth Scholand

Bibliographic record

VenueJCR Journal of Clinical Rheumatology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Population and Public Health
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicineMultiple sclerosisDiseaseInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The implementation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of clinical practice. The use of PROMs is particularly important in patients with complex, chronic medical disease that have heterogeneous, subjective symptoms. In this report, we examine the association of traditional markers of disease severity in the systemic sclerosis (SSc) patient population with PROMs that focus on mental health and physical function. METHODS: SSc patients seen in the University of Utah Chronic Disease Clinic were offered a personal health assessment that included a current health visual analog scale (VAS), PROMs that assessed mental health [Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Bank v1.0 depression], and physical function (PROMIS Bank v1.2 physical function). All PROMIS instruments are normed such that an average person has a score of 50. The assessment was administered on a tablet while patients waited to see the physician(s) for SSc care visits and uploaded in real-time to the electronic medical record for physician review. RESULTS: During a six-month period, 137 unique SSc patients began a PROM assessment. All 137 patients completed the VAS and PROMIS physical function; 133 completed the PROMIS depression scales. Overall, scores were 53.1 and 43.2 for depression and physical function, respectively. Relatively mild patients without end-organ damage or disease activity due to SSc did not have significant differences in perceived reduction in general health, physical function, or depression when compared to SSc patients with digital ulcerations, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary arterial hypertension, inflammatory arthritis, inflammatory myositis, or joint contractures. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic disease report depression and physical health scores that are independent of traditional physician-perceived disease activity or damage. Disease burden associates with the presence of a chronic disease, but is independent of severity. Assessment of PROMs provides an additional perspective on health status for chronic disease care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJCR Journal of Clinical RheumatologySame topicSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesFrench-language works237,207