Hydrothermal dewatering of lignite water slurries: Part 2 surface properties and stability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, the mechanism of the stability of lignite lignite water slurry after hydrothermal dewatering/treatment (HTD) was studied by the measurement of the yield stress and the fractal dimension of the slurry. The effects of HTD on the surface properties of low rank coal were characterized by the contact angle, zeta potential, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. After HTD, the hydrophobic attraction between coal particles was found to increase, as shown by the increase of the contact angle, and the electrical double layer repulsion was found to decrease, due to the decrease of zeta potential. These effects lead to an increase on the inter‐particle attractions, which is also proven by the theoretical calculations on the interaction energy using the extended DLVO theory. The stability measurements show that the low rank coal water slurry (CWS) becomes more stable after HTD, which is probably due to the formation of a network structure (soft sediment) by coal aggregating across the whole volume of the slurry to prevent coal particles from settling down. The network structure (soft sediment) in coal water slurry after HTD was verified and quantified by the yield stress and fractal dimension. Our findings indicated that the static stability of coal water slurry may be acquired by the network structure of the aggregated coal particles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it