MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794017901 · doi:10.21037/aes.2018.ab084

AB084. Correlation between histopathology and optical coherence tomography in periocular tumors

2018· article· en· W2794017901 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Eye Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEar and Head Tumors
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyHistopathologyCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)CorrelationMedicinePathologyRadiologyPhysicsMathematicsGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) accounts for 90% of the eyelid malignancies followed by sebaceous cell carcinoma (SC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Even though biopsy for histopathological (HP) evaluation remains the gold standard for confirming the diagnosis of eyelid tumors and the status of surgical margins, noninvasive techniques such as dermoscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT) may increase diagnostic sensitivity and contribute to more accurate delineation of surgical margins. The purpose of this prospective study was to correlate the HP and OCT findings of eyelid malignancies. Methods: After ethics committee approval (BCC/2017-2608), patients with suspected eyelid carcinomas had photographs taken, tumor characteristics assessed clinically and using dermoscopy and OCT, which were subsequently compared with HP evaluation. We obtained OCT images of periorbital tumors with an anterior segment lens adjusted in an Optovue Avanti. The histopathology was evaluated using a digital pathology system. Patients under 18 years old were excluded from this study. Results: Three female and three male patients (age 69–88 years) with lesions located in the lower periorbital area (n=5) and upper eyelid (n=1) were included in this study. Two participants previously had skin cancer: 1 female patient had a lentigo maligna and a BCC, and 1 male patient had multiple BCC and actinic keratosis due to immunosuppression related to a liver transplant. Clinical and dermoscopic diagnosis were accurate in four cases: 3 BCC and 1 SCC. One clinically suspicious BCC was diagnosed as SC and one patient had a previous confirmed diagnosis of SC. All OCT images showed disruption of the dermoepidermal junction and hyporeflective areas in the dermis, which were darker and well-delineated in the three confirmed BCCs. OCT also clearly demarcated the transition between tumor and normal skin in all cases. Conclusions: OCT is a fast and non-invasive exam to acquire high-resolution images of intraocular and ocular surface structures. Preliminary data from our study indicates that real-time OCT images correlate with HP findings and may also help delineate tumor margins. The inclusion of additional participants will provide further evidence of the benefits of using OCT pre-operatively to safely minimize surgical margins during eyelid tumor excision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it