MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794109934 · doi:10.1080/00084433.2018.1431076

Characterisation of solid phases in the iron–sulphate–water system where silver is present

2018· article· en· W2794109934 on OpenAlexafffund
A. A. Gunaratnam, David Dreisinger, Y. Choi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Metallurgical Quarterly · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMine drainage and remediation techniques
Canadian institutionsBarrick Gold (Canada)University of British Columbia
FundersMitacsBarrick Gold Corporation
KeywordsGold cyanidationJarositeArsenopyriteLimeChemistryDissolutionMetallurgyPyriteFerricCyanideNuclear chemistryInorganic chemistryMaterials scienceMineralogyCopperChalcopyrite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pressure oxidation (POX)-hot cure (HC)-lime boil (LB) process is used in industry to recover silver from refractory gold sulphide ores containing minerals such as pyrite and arsenopyrite. Pressure oxidation is used to oxidise minerals and liberate occluded gold particles. As such, iron goes into solution and under acidic and high-temperature conditions often precipitates as basic iron sulphate (BFS). BFS consumes excess lime during neutralisation before cyanidation. Therefore, a hot cure stage is required to re-dissolve BFS back into solution. BFS re-dissolution consumes acid and produces ferric sulphate. In the presence of silver, these conditions favour the slow formation of silver jarosite. Silver jarosite is refractory to cyanidation and must be broken down before cyanidation. This is done in the lime boil to produce a cyanide-soluble silver hydroxide. A study was conducted to investigate parameters that affect the precipitates that form in each stage of the POX-HC-LB process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Metallurgical QuarterlySame topicMine drainage and remediation techniquesFrench-language works237,207