MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794127037 · doi:10.1002/uog.19004

Prolonged duration of persistent cell‐free fetal DNA from vanishing twin

2018· letter· en· W2794127037 on OpenAlexaff
Kirsten M. Niles, Ally Murji, David Chitayat

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAneuploidyFetusCell-free fetal DNAObstetricsGynecologyGestational agePregnancyPrenatal diagnosisBiologyGeneticsChromosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA)-based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy provides a highly accurate screening test that may reduce the need for invasive testing1. It has also been utilized to determine fetal sex with greater than 98% accuracy2. Cumulatively, NIPT has an approximately 1% false-positive rate2, one-third of which has a biological explanation such as maternal copy number variant, maternal mosaicism, maternal malignancy, confined placental mosaicism, fetal mosaicism or a vanishing twin3. The rate of vanishing twin pregnancy detected by NIPT ranges from 0.42 to 0.6%4. Cotwin demise, however, contributes as much as 42.1% to confirmed false-positive NIPT results3,4. The duration of cffDNA persistence from a demised twin, which may interfere with NIPT accuracy, is currently unknown. To date, the longest documented interval following ultrasound identification of cotwin demise and its detection using NIPT is 8 weeks4. The following report is of a case of discordant sex identification using NIPT, 15 weeks after the identification of cotwin demise. A 31-year-old healthy nulliparous woman underwent in-vitro fertilization with double-embryo transfer. First-trimester ultrasound examinations from 6 + 1 weeks onwards demonstrated two gestational sacs: one containing a single live embryo and one that was anembryonic. First-trimester aneuploidy screening was negative. An ultrasound examination at 21 + 2 weeks identified an appropriately grown female fetus with a right-sided echogenic intracardiac focus and two-vessel cord. The couple pursued cffDNA testing at 21 + 3 weeks. Results indicated a male fetus with low aneuploidy risk. Due to discordance between the sex indicated using cffDNA testing and that indicated on ultrasound, the images were reviewed and the patient was referred for further genetic testing. Ultrasound at 23 + 2 weeks confirmed female genitalia and identified a likely fetal uterus. Repeat cffDNA testing at 28 + 6 weeks' gestation was consistent with a female fetus. Invasive investigations were declined. Following an uncomplicated vaginal delivery, a detailed physical exam confirmed normal female genitalia. The postnatal course was uncomplicated. This case describes misidentification of fetal sex due to a vanishing twin. The unique feature of this case is the 15 weeks separating the identification of cotwin demise and the discordant NIPT result. This is significantly longer than the previously documented interval of 8 weeks4. Gestational age at demise and persistence of fetal tissue may influence the fetal fraction of circulating DNA attributable to the demised twin and for how long it is detectable using conventional testing. Clinically, cffDNA testing is an adjunct to traditional aneuploidy screening. In this case, its persistence from the demised cotwin for at least 15 weeks indicates a risk of false positives throughout the primary period of aneuploidy screening, including after soft-marker identification on ultrasound. In cases of a known vanishing twin, it is important for practitioners to be aware of the potential for prolonged false-positive NIPT results secondary to the demised

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207