Treatment of depression with cognitive impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with agomelatine (valdoxan) in depressive patients with marked cognitive impairment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients (women 77.1%) were recruited to participate in the study. Mean age of patients was 48.9±3.5 years. The following scales and cognitive tests were used: HAM-21, CGI, HADS, MMSE, the Stroop task, the Rey test, RAVLT. Effective therapeutic doses of valdoxan were 25mg per day in 77.1% of patients, 50 mg per day beginning from week 2 in 22.9%. Cognitive impairment was found in astheno-apathic depression (51.4%), anxiety-hypochondriacal depression (28.6%), anhedonic depression (5.7%). RESULTS: The results showed that 74.3% of patients were responders and 51.4% were in remission. The dynamic of cognitive impairment demonstrated the positive effect of treatment with agomelatine (valdoxan). Beneficial safety profile of valdoxan was confirmed. CONCLUSION: Valdoxan is the effective and relatively safe antidepressant; it can be recommended for treatment of depression with cognitive impairment in therapeutic doses for at least 6 weeks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".