MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2794295480 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.084

A83 THE MUCOSA-ASSOCIATED-MICROBIOTA IS ASSOCIATED WITH RELAPSE IN CROHN’S DISEASE PATIENTS UNDERGOING ILEOCECAL RESECTION

2018· article· en· W2794295480 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Laffin, Troy Perry, H Park, Patrick M. Gillevet, Masoumeh Sikaroodi, Gilaad G. Kaplan, Richard N. Fedorak, Karen I. Kroeker, Levinus A. Dieleman, Bryan J. Dicken, Karen Madsen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrohn's diseaseGastroenterologyAnastomosisDiseaseInternal medicineIleumMicrobiomeGut floraBiologySurgeryMedicineImmunologyBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A large proportion of Crohn’s disease patients require an intestinal resection at some point. The most common type of intestinal resection in CD patients is an ileocolonic resection (ICR). Unfortunately, following ICR, disease recurs at the anastomosis in up to 80% of subjects at one year. Evidence suggests that the fecal stream and its associated microbial contents play a central role in disease recurrence. The aim of this study was to define the mucosal-associated microbiota at the time of ICR and 6 months post-operatively and to determine if microbial community structure at the time of surgery was predictive of future disease relapse. Ileal biopsies were obtained at surgery and after 6 months from CD patients undergoing ICR (n=45). Composition and function of mucosal associated microbiota was assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing and PICRUSt analysis. Endoscopic recurrence was assessed using the Rutgeerts score. As a measurement of tissue disease activity, TNFα concentration was measured in ileal samples taken at the time of surgery using a Meso Scale discovery platform. To identify microbial composition and metabolic pathways with differentiating abundance in the different groups, the LDA (Linear Discriminant Analysis) Effect Size (LEfSe) algorithm was used with the online interface Galaxy. At 6 months, 30 patients remained in remission while 15 had recurrent disease. Demographic data between the two groups was similar. At the time of surgery, LEFse analysis of mucosal biopsies showed Clostridiales to predict maintenance of remission while Enterobacteriales predicted disease recurrence. In addition, a greater proportion of microbial genes associated with aerobic respiration were present in biopsy samples taken at surgery from patients which went on to have disease recurrence. An increase in Lachnospiraceae from surgery to 6 months post-ICR was associated with remission. At the time of surgery there was no difference in α-diversity or degree of inflammation as measured by TNFα levels between the patients which remained in remission or had disease recurrence at 6 months. Specific mucosal-associated bacterial populations and gene content at the time of surgery are associated with maintenance of remission following ICR in subjects with CD, independent of inflammation. This identification of specific bacterial populations associated with maintenance of remission may enable the development of targeted therapies to alter gut ecology towards a specific profile and thus prevent post-operative recurrence of CD. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→