MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2794318180 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.206

A205 CONGENITAL ABSENCE OF THE PORTAL VEIN: DOES IT REALLY EXIST?

2018· article· en· W2794318180 on OpenAlexaff
Noémie Laverdure, Michel Lallier, Josée Dubois, Massimiliano Paganelli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePortosystemic shuntLiver transplantationInferior vena cavaShunt (medical)SurgeryOcclusionPortal venous pressurePercutaneousRadiologyFistulaPortal hypertensionHepatic encephalopathyTransplantationCirrhosisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenital portosystemic shunts are rare vascular malformation that can lead to pulmonary hypertension, encephalopathy and liver tumors. They were classified as type I(end-to-side portocaval fistula with no visible portal flow in the liver) and type II(side-to-side portocaval fistula)shunts.Type I shunts are often referred to a congenital absence of the portal vein(CAPV), and are still considered an indication for liver transplantation, whereas surgical or percutaneous closure is usually feasible for type II shunts. Through a case report and a review of all published patients, we show that what is initially diagnosed as CAPV may conceal a hypoplasic portal vein that can successfully be closed by surgical ligation. A 2-year-old girl was referred for liver transplantation in the context of recent diagnosis of CAPV. At presentation she was asymptomatic and showed a hypertrophic left liver lobe, without any complications. Her blood tests were normal excepted for moderately elevated serum ammonia levels. MRI confirmed the diagnosis of a type Ib portosystemic shunt(with superior mesenteric and splenic veins joining to form a short portal trunk ending into the inferior vena cava). Percutaneous venogram confirmed the absence of the portal vein. Nevertheless, a second direct catheterization of the shunt with temporary shunt occlusion allowed us to visualize an hypoplasic portal vein arising from the posterior face of the shunt. Pressure was measured at 12mmHg in standard conditions and 36mmHg upon temporary occlusion. We decided for a two-step occlusion. A partial banding was carried out without significant complications(normal liver tests, minimal transient ascites). The shunt was permeable, with a measurable portal flow, at follow-up Doppler ultrasound. 2 months later, moderate elevation of liver enzymes(3xULN) and mild ascites were detected, but resolved spontaneously within a few weeks. The shunt was not detected anymore, and the Doppler study showed a normal portal flow. A percutaneous venogram confirmed the total closure of the shunt and the permeability of the portal vein. The child is asymptomatic at 6-month follow-up. 202 cases of extrahepatic shunts were reported since 1979, of which 134 were described as CAPV. 38 patients(19%) had percutaneous or surgical shunt closure(12 &26, respectively), whereas 25 patients(12%) received a liver transplantation. Among all transplanted patients, only 4% had a preoperative percutaneous venogram with temporary shunt occlusion. Overall, the case reported here exemplifies what emerges from published literature: a precise evaluation of the shunt with percutanous venogram and temporary occlusion is warranted in all patients with suspected CAPV. It allows detecting otherwise invisible hypoplasic portal veins that allow tore establish a physiological hepatic circulation and avoid liver transplantation. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0060.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicLiver Disease and Transplantation→French-language works237,207→