MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2794322900 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.271

A270 EFFECTS OF KETOPROFEN AND ITS HYDROGEN SULFIDE-RELEASING DERIVATIVE ON THE IMMATURE HUMAN INTESTINE

2018· article· en· W2794322900 on OpenAlexaff
Maxime Thibault, E. Tremblay, John L. Wallace, Jean‐François Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKetoprofenGastrointestinal tractHydrogen sulfideLipopolysaccharideSmall intestinePharmacologyAdverse effectGene expressionChemistryHuman gastrointestinal tractGeneInternal medicineMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) among neonates is associated with a broad spectrum of life-threatening adverse effects on the gastrointestinal tract. Indeed, we have previously demonstrated that NSAIDs, such as indomethacin (INDO), induce damaging effects on the immature intestine (Perron et al. Genomics, 2013). Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has been reported to exert a number of cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects in many organ systems. Thus, in order to minimize the deleterious effects caused by NSAIDs, several H2S-releasing derivatives have been developed, including ATB-352, an H2S-releasing derivative of ketoprofen. In the present study, we determined the effects of ketoprofen (KETO) and its H2S-releasing derivative on the human mid-gestational intestine using serum-free organ culture, and compared them with those previously described for INDO. The representative genes involved with the deleterious effect of INDO were used as reference to compare the effect of KETO and/or its derivative ATB-352 on the mid-gestation human small intestine after a treatment of 48 hours. Gene expression levels were measured by qRT-PCR. By determining the gene expression of COX2 in cultured human small intestinal explants, we observed two distinct patterns of response that allowed to divide the specimens into two groups: 1) those with an increased expression of COX2 mRNA (KETO-responder group), and 2) those where COX2 remained unchanged (non-responder group). For the non-responder group, no significant change was observed compared to control. Although the inflammatory response observed between INDO and the KETO-responder group was similar (CXCL14 and TFF1), the negative effects on oxidoreductase activity (DUOX2, NOS2, SOD2) and intestinal permeability (OCLN, CLDN1) induced by INDO were not found with KETO, suggesting a beneficial effect of KETO on the small intestinal mucosa. In addition, the use of the H2S-releasing derivative of KETO did not induce significant changes compared to KETO on these metabolic pathways. Our results show that KETO (responder group) has beneficial effects on oxidoreductase activity and epithelial permeability in the immature human small intestine compared to INDO. However, the lack of beneficial effects of H2S on the small intestinal mucosa in organ culture suggests a systemic type mechanism rather than a local one. CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→