The Pilgangoora Lithium-Tantalum Deposit - Geological Overview and Evolution of Discovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Pilgangoora Lithium-tantalum pegmatite deposit with a total resource of 156.3 Mt grading 1.25% Li2O and 128ppm Ta2O5, is a globally significant hard-rock lithium-tantalum deposit. The deposit is located in the East Pilbara Terrane of the northwest Pilbara Craton in Western Australia. The Northwest Pilbara Craton is one of the world’s major lithium-tanatlum provinces with large scale lithium-caesium-tantlum bearing pegmatites located at Mt Francisco, Wodgina, Pilgangoora and Strelley.Pegmatites bearing columbite-tantalite at Mt. York were first described in government geological surveys in 1906. Subsequent interest in the pegmatites focussed on their tin and tantalum mineral potential, with small scale hardrock, eluvial and alluvial mining, chiefly in the period 1947-1978. Larger scale alluvial and eluvial mining of tin-tantalum was carried out over 1978-1982 and 1992-1996 by a number of junior companies. In May 2014, Pilbara Minerals acquired the Pilgangoora Project for its lithium potential and has since drilled over 1450 holes for approximately 120,000 metres.The Pilgangoora pegmatite intrusions crop out in a well exposed greenstone belt, with little weathering at surface. Exploration drilling programs along with detailed geological mapping of the Pilgangoora tenement group has provided a better understanding of the geological setting of the fractionated pegmatite intrusions within the East Strelley greenstone belt. This work has led to the recognition of some valuable exploration criteria that may be applied locally to locate additional resources and, longer term, may be used more strategically to review other pegmatite fields across the Pilbara region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".