Altered Immune-Related Gene Expressions Indicate Oral Cancer Nodal Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lymph nodal disease (LN+) is the most significant prognostic factor of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Current risk indicator(s) for guiding elective neck dissection (END) is insufficient for clinically node-negative (cN0) patients, resulting in under- or overtreatment. While the role of immunological events in tumorigenesis and metastasis is evident, the prognostic implication in OSCC remains unclear. The study objective was to investigate large-scale immune-related gene expression and determine its prognostic value on node-free survival (NFS). We analyzed patients who received intent-to-cure surgery with at least 3 y of follow-up and known outcome of LN through a pan-Canadian surgical trial. Total RNA was extracted from surgical tissues with >70% tumor content and analyzed on a 730-gene panel (NanoString nCounter® PanCancer Immune Panel). We first profiled gene expression in a fresh-frozen (FF) discovery set to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes, which were then used in unsupervised clustering analysis to identify patient subgroups. The prognostic value of the identified DE genes was then validated on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. A total of 177 RNA samples were derived from 89 FF and 88 FFPE surgical tissues, of which 45 (51%) and 40 (45%), respectively, were from patients who developed LN+. We identified 6 DE genes overexpressed in LN+ tumors (false discovery rate <0.001; log 2 fold change >1). Clustering analysis separated the patients into 2 subgroups (CM1, CM2), with CM2 exhibiting significantly increased expression and worse 5-y NFS rate (28%; P < 0.001). The prognostic value of these 6 candidate genes was validated on FFPE samples, which were also separated into 2 distinct prognostic groups, confirming the association between increased gene expression and poor 5-y NFS (CM1, 70.3%; CM2, 43.3%; P = 0.01). This is the first study identifying a panel of immune-related genes associated with NFS that can potentially be used clinically stratifying the risk of LN+ at the time of OSCC diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".