MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794449867 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby016.350

T74. ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SCHIZOPHRENIA: A META-ANALYSIS

2018· article· en· W2794449867 on OpenAlexaff
Hannah Dickson, Alexis E. Cullen, Sheilagh Hodgins, James H. MacCabe, Kristin R. Laurens

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Academic achievementPsychologyClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatryMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extent to which poor academic achievement is associated with later schizophrenia is unclear. The aim of the present study was to update our prior meta-analyses which examined academic achievement in youth aged 16 years or younger who later developed schizophrenia or schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and those who did not (Dickson et al, 2012, Psychological Medicine, 42, 743–755). We also conducted a new meta-analysis on published studies that reported on general academic achievement in youth at-risk for schizophrenia/SSD aged 16 years or younger compared to typically developing youth In addition to the five studies included in our earlier meta-analyses, a further three prospective investigations of birth or genetic high-risk cohorts were identified that reported results using objective measures of general academic achievement and of mathematics achievement for individuals who did and did not develop schizophrenia/SSD in adulthood. For our new meta-analysis we identified a total of seven studies that met the following inclusion criteria: (1) written in English; (2) objective measure of general academic achievement consisting of scores on least two core academic subjects (i.e., literacy and mathematics) at age 16 years or younger; (3) results provided for youth at high risk for developing schizophrenia/SSD in adulthood by virtue of having at least one first-degree relative with the disorder or reporting psychotic like-experiences (PLEs); and (4) sufficient data to calculate effect sizes. Meta-analyses showed that by age 16 years, individuals who later developed schizophrenia/SSD presented with significantly poorer general academic achievement (d=-0.26) and mathematics achievement (d=-0.21). Findings also indicated that during adolescence, youth with a family history of schizophrenia/SSD and youth reporting PLES were characterised by significantly lower general academic achievement than healthy peers (d=-0.39; d=-0.53, respectively). These results show that poor academic achievement precedes illness onset, and may represent an easily identifiable non-specific marker of biological, psychological and social risk processes underpinning the development of schizophrenia/SSD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFrench-language works237,207