MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794465098 · doi:10.1049/pbpo130e_ch11

Power-to-gas and power-to-power for storage and ancillary services in urban areas

2018· book-chapter· en· W2794465098 on OpenAlex
Ushnik Mukherjee, Sean Walker, Azadeh Maroufmashat, Michael Fowler

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitution of Engineering and Technology eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDispatchable generationBase load power plantPower to gasRenewable energyElectricityElectricity generationStand-alone power systemEnergy storageElectric power systemPower (physics)Demand responseWind powerPeaking power plantGrid energy storageEnvironmental scienceDistributed generationProcess engineeringElectrical engineeringEnvironmental economicsEngineeringEconomicsChemistryPhysicsElectrolyte

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, power-to-gas, whereby hydrogen is generated electrolytically, and power-to-power, whereby electricity is used to produce hydrogen which is used, in turn, to generate electricity at a later time, are examined for their efficiency and emissions reductions in providing energy storage and ancillary services. Due to a large baseload of nuclear energy in the province of Ontario, and with wind generation added to the grid prior to 2014, the supply of electricity exceeds demand at certain times of the year during off-peak hours. To manage this excess supply, electricity is exported to neighboring provinces and states at a low, often negative price, due to the decreased demand and surplus generation. To curb these exports, the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) has switched renewable generators from nondispatchable to dispatchable energy sources that can be turned on or off or adjusted to output a different quantity of energy. In addition, due to the large baseload, the IESO has also shifted to allowing loads to offer demand response services previously only offered by generators. In this analysis, the rapid response of polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzers, used to generate hydrogen in power-to-gas and power-to-power systems is also able to offer important and high value auxiliary and regulatory power services. In power-to-gas systems, the hydrogen produced is an alternative energy vector which can be contained within the natural gas infrastructure or other storage medium. For this analysis, the authors employ the General Algebraic Modeling Simulation to develop a simulation of a 2-MW power-to-gas and power-to-power system that produces hydrogen for energy storage and then uses this hydrogen to generate electricity when there is a peak in energy demand. This energy is then reintroduced into the electrical grid using a hydrogen turbine. The power-to-power scheme, although typically less energy efficient, provides the flexibility to meet changing energy demands while generating hydrogen that can be used for industrial purposes and as a transportation fuel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it