MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794478976 · doi:10.1002/path.5081

Somatic <i>POLE</i> exonuclease domain mutations are early events in sporadic endometrial and colorectal carcinogenesis, determining driver mutational landscape, clonal neoantigen burden and immune response

2018· article· en· W2794478976 on OpenAlex
Daniel Temko, Inge C. van Gool, Emily Rayner, Mark A. Glaire, Seiko Makino, Matthew Brown, Laura Chegwidden, Claire Palles, Jeroen Depreeuw, Andrew D. Beggs, Chaido Stathopoulou, John Mason, Ann‐Marie Baker, Marc Williams, Vincenzo Cerundolo, Margarida Rei, Jenny C. Taylor, Anna Schuh, Ahmed Ahmed, Frédéric Amant, Diether Lambrechts, Vincent T.H.B.M. Smit, Tjalling Bosse, Trevor A. Graham, David N. Church, Ian Tomlinson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Pathology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFP7 HealthEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthVlaamse regeringMedical Research Council CanadaEuropean CommissionDepartment of Health and Aged Care, Australian GovernmentFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekHealth FoundationWellcome TrustCancer Research UKAcademy of Medical SciencesH2020 European Research CouncilOvarian Cancer ActionNational Cancer InstituteKWF KankerbestrijdingNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsGenome instabilityBiologyCarcinogenesisSomatic cellMutationGermline mutationDNA mismatch repairCancer researchExome sequencingGeneticsCancerExonucleaseExomeMutation rateMicrosatellite instabilityColorectal cancerGeneDNA damageDNAMicrosatelliteAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Genomic instability, which is a hallmark of cancer, is generally thought to occur in the middle to late stages of tumourigenesis, following the acquisition of permissive molecular aberrations such as TP53 mutation or whole genome doubling. Tumours with somatic POLE exonuclease domain mutations are notable for their extreme genomic instability (their mutation burden is among the highest in human cancer), distinct mutational signature, lymphocytic infiltrate, and excellent prognosis. To what extent these characteristics are determined by the timing of POLE mutations in oncogenesis is unknown. Here, we have shown that pathogenic POLE mutations are detectable in non‐malignant precursors of endometrial and colorectal cancer. Using genome and exome sequencing, we found that multiple driver mutations in POLE‐ mutant cancers show the characteristic POLE mutational signature, including those in genes conventionally regarded as initiators of tumourigenesis. In POLE‐ mutant cancers, the proportion of monoclonal predicted neoantigens was similar to that in other cancers, but the absolute number was much greater. We also found that the prominent CD8 + T‐cell infiltrate present in POLE ‐mutant cancers was evident in their precursor lesions. Collectively, these data indicate that somatic POLE mutations are early, quite possibly initiating, events in the endometrial and colorectal cancers in which they occur. The resulting early onset of genomic instability may account for the striking immune response and excellent prognosis of these tumours, as well as their early presentation. © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it