MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794490671 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby018.966

S179. PROGNOSTIC UTILITY OF MULTIVARIATE MORPHOMETRY IN SCHIZOPHRENIA

2018· article· en· W2794490671 on OpenAlexaff
Mingli Li, Xiaojing Li, Wei Deng, Yinfei Li, Liansheng Zhao, Xiaohong Ma, Yingcheng Wang, Hua Yu, Yajing Meng, Qiang Wang, Lena Palaniyappan, Tao Li

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMental Health and Psychiatry
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultivariate statisticsUnivariatePsychopathologyMultivariate analysisPsychologyVoxel-based morphometryPositive and Negative Syndrome ScaleSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Magnetic resonance imagingVoxelBrain sizeInternal medicineClinical psychologyPsychosisPsychiatryMedicineStatisticsWhite matterMathematicsRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Groups of spatially distributed regions show shared variance in morphometric properties (e.g. grey matter volume) among subjects, thus forming independent morphometric ‘sources’ or covariance-based networks. Source based morphometry is a multivariate approach that is based on independent component analysis, and accounts for the inter-relationahsip among different brain regions while filtering out noisy artefactual effects of mass univariate voxel-based approaches. We have previously demonstrated that with multivariate SBM, it is possible to identify the structural basis of subtle psychopathological features such as formal thought disorder, whose anatomical correlates have been hitherto elusive. In the current study, we use multivariate SBM to identify the morphometric sources in drug-naïve first episode subjects that show progressive changes that predict symptom change over 1 year. 63 first-episode, drug-naive patients with schizophrenia underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging scans at baseline (T0) and rescanned after 1 year follow-up (T1). Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was used to assess their psychopathology. Source based morphometry (SBM) was performed to analyze the gray matter volume (GMV), paired T contrasts for loading coefficients of GMV were constructed to detect the components that showed a significant effect of time. The change in PANSS scores between baseline and 1 year was expressed as a ratio of the scores at baseline - adjusted change scores for positive symptoms (POS%), negative symptoms (NEG%) and disorganization symptoms (DISORG%), with each domain score derived using van der Gaag’s 5-factor approach. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to predict the percentage change scores in each domain using the T0 and T1 loading coefficients of components showing time effect with age, gender and cumulative antipsychotic dose as covariates. Of the 30 spatial components of gray matter identified by SBM, loading coefficients of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), anterior insula (AI) & inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), superior temporal gyrus (STG), middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) reduced with time in patients. The lower volume of AI & IFG at baseline and at 1 year related to poor improvement in positive and disorganization symptoms; lower volume of STG & MTG at baseline and 1 year predicted poor improvement in negative symptoms. The baseline distribution of GM in AI & IFG, STG and MTG are predictive of the course of illness. The relationship between GM sources and symptom severity continues even after 1 year of naturalistic exposure to antipsychotic treatment. If judiciously combined with other available predictors of prognosis, source-based morphometric analysis can aid meaningful prognostication in schizophrenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicMental Health and PsychiatryFrench-language works237,207