Longitudinal Association Between Human Parechovirus Central Nervous System Infection and Gross-Motor Neurodevelopment in Young Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A paucity of studies investigated the association between human parechovirus (HPeV) central nervous system (CNS) infection and motor and neurocognitive development of children. This study describes the gross-motor function (GMF) in young children during 24 months after HPeV-CNS infection compared with children in whom no pathogen was detected. METHODS: GMF of children was assessed with Alberta Infant Motor Scale, Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development or Movement Assessment Battery for Children. We conducted multivariate analyses and adjusted for age at onset, maternal education and time from infection. RESULTS: Of 91 included children, at onset <24 months of age, 11 had HPeV-CNS infection and in 47 no pathogen was detected. Nineteen children were excluded because of the presence of other infection, preterm birth or genetic disorder, and in 14 children, parents refused to consent for participation. We found no longitudinal association between HPeV-CNS infection and GMF (β = -0.53; 95% confidence interval: -1.18 to 0.07; P = 0.11). At 6 months, children with HPeV-CNS infection had suspect GMF delay compared with the nonpathogen group (mean difference = 1.12; 95% confidence interval: -1.96 to -0.30; P = 0.03). This difference disappeared during 24-month follow-up and, after adjustment for age at onset, both groups scored within the normal range for age. Maternal education and time from infection did not have any meaningful influence. CONCLUSIONS: We found no longitudinal association between HPeV-CNS infection and GMF during the first 24-month follow-up. Children with HPeV-CNS infection showed a suspect GMF delay at 6-month follow-up. This normalized during 24-month follow-up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".