MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

P5559The effect of prehospital P2Y12 receptor inhibition in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the ATLANTIC-Elderly analysis

2017· article· en· W2794504260 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J.‐P. Collet, Matheieu Kerneis, Guillaume Cayla, J.S. Silvain, Frédéric Lapostolle, Patrick Ecollan, Leonardo Bolognese, Arnoud W.J. van ’t Hof, Christian Hamm, Anne Tsatsaris, Jurien Ten Berg, Abdourahmane Diallo, Éric Vicaut, Gilles Montalescot

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniwersytet Rzeszowski
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneous coronary interventionMyocardial infarctionP2Y12CardiologyInternal medicineST segmentElevation (ballistics)Emergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims To examine whether the main results of the ATLANTIC trial in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), randomized to pre- versus in-hospital ticagrelor, differ according to class of age. Methods and results: Patients were evaluated by class of age (<75 vs. ≥75) for demographics, prior cardiovascular history and risk factors, management, and outcomes. Elderly patients (304/1862) were more likely to be women, diabetic, lean, with a prior history of myocardial infarction and CABG, and with comorbidities (p<0.01 for all). Elderly presented more frequently with acute heart failure, had less frequently thromboaspiration and a stent implanted (p<0.01). They received significantly less frequently GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors before PCI, parenteral anticoagulation after PCI and a maintenance dose of P2Y12 inhibitors. elderly patients had higher rates of the following endpoints: absence of post-PCI ≥70% ST-segment elevation resolution (51.6% versus 43.9%; P=0.035), absence of TIMI 3 flow grade after PCI (27.5% versus 17.1%, p=0.0002), composite of death/MI/stroke/urgent revascularization (9.9% versus 2.9%; OR 3.67 95% CI [2.27; 5.93], p<0.0001) and mortality (8.5% versus 1.5%; OR 6.45 95% CI [2.75; 15.11], p<0.0001). They also tended to have more frequently major bleedings (TIMI major 2.3% versus 1.1%; OR 2.13 [0.88; 5.18], p=0.095). There was no significant interaction between time of ticagrelor administration (pre-hospital versus in-lab) and class of age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research→French-language works237,207→