MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794541189 · doi:10.1190/tle37040262.1

Microseismic monitoring of Vaca Muerta completions in the Neuquén Basin, Argentina

2018· article· en· W2794541189 on OpenAlexaff
David Curia, Peter Duncan, Michael Grealy, Jon McKenna, Andrew Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsMicrosemi (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeophoneGeologyOil shaleStructural basinMicroseismTight oilBlock (permutation group theory)Petroleum engineeringSeismologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Vaca Muerta shale oil play in Argentina's Neuquén Basin is expected to make a large contribution to Argentina's hydrocarbon production in the future. In 2013, the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimated that the Vaca Muerta had technically recoverable reserves of 308 Tcf gas and 16 billion bbl of oil and condensate, making it the third largest shale oil reservoir in the world at that time. Wintershall Energia has been active in the Neuquén Basin since 1994. In 2014, it acquired a controlling interest in the Aguada Federal block with an intention to exploit the Vaca Muerta oil shale occurrence within that block. At the outset of its development program, Wintershall decided to incorporate microseismic monitoring to help understand completions in the Vaca Muerta. Monitoring of the completion of vertical well AF.x-1 was accomplished with a surface array. The goal of the monitoring was to inform later decisions on horizontal wellbore direction, wellbore and stage spacing, and landing depth. Results of the surface array monitoring were also used in the design of a permanent buried array intended to monitor subsequent development wells. The buried array was installed in September 2016 and consists of 126 stations spread at an interval distance of approximately 500 m over an area of roughly 5 by 7 km. Each station has geophones placed over a depth range of 20 to 50 m subsurface. The first two horizontal development wells in the project, AF.x-4h and AF.x-9h, were completed in late December 2016 and early January 2017. The second set of two wells, AF.x-3h and AF.x-7h, was completed from May to June 2017. The 4h and the 7h were landed in the upper Middle Vaca Muerta while the 9h and 3h were drilled about 100 m deeper, landing still in the Middle Vaca Muerta. The lateral length of each well was approximately 1000 m, and each was completed with 11 plug-and-perf stages. Stage length and interval were varied along the wells to test various completion strategies. The completions of all four wells were successfully monitored using the buried array. These microseismic data provide a detailed description of the fracture network created by the treatments. Focal mechanisms determined for the detected events have been used to understand the stress distribution in the reservoir and to further refine the completion parameters for future development wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207