Antibiotic exposure and development of necrotizing enterocolitis in very preterm neonates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the duration of antibiotic exposure and development of stage 2 or 3 necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in very preterm neonates. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study was conducted from Canadian Neonatal Network data for preterm neonates born before 29 weeks' gestation and admitted 2010 through 2013. Efforts were made to match each NEC case to two controls for gestational age, birth weight (±100 g) and sex. RESULTS: A total of 224 cases and 447 controls were identified. The incidence of antenatal steroid administration, the number of days nil-per-os and the number of antibiotic days prior to onset of NEC were significantly different in neonates with NEC. A multiple regression analysis revealed that the duration of antibiotic use was higher among NEC cases compared to controls (P<0.01). Empiric antibiotic treatment of 5 or more days was associated with significantly increased odds of NEC as compared with antibiotic exposure of 0 to 4 days (adjusted odds ratio: 2.02; 95% CI 1.55, 3.13). CONCLUSION: Empiric antibiotic exposure for 5 or more days in preterm neonates born before 29 weeks' gestation was associated with an increased risk of NEC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".