MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794595921 · doi:10.1090/conm/704/14160

Calculus on a non-Archimedean field extension of the real numbers: inverse function theorem, intermediate value theorem and mean value theorem

2018· other· en· W2794595921 on OpenAlexaff
Gidon Bookatz, Khodr Shamseddine

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary mathematics - American Mathematical Society · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMean value theorem (divided differences)Extension (predicate logic)Fundamental theorem of calculusBrouwer fixed-point theoremInverse function theoremPicard–Lindelöf theoremIsomorphism extension theoremField (mathematics)InverseValue (mathematics)Pure mathematicsCarlson's theoremDanskin's theoremDiscrete mathematicsFixed-point theorem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce the concept of weakly locally uniformly differentiable functions (WLUD) on N \mathcal {N} , a non-Archimedean field extension of the real numbers that is real closed and Cauchy complete in the topology induced by the order. We show that WLUD functions are C 1 C^1 and they form an N \mathcal {N} -algebra that is closed under composition and contains all polynomial functions. We formulate and prove a version of the inverse function theorem as well as a local intermediate value theorem for these functions. Then we generalize the WLUD concept to higher orders of differentiability and study WLUD n ^n functions at a point or on a subset of N \mathcal {N} . In particular, we study the properties of WLUD 2 ^2 functions and we formulate and prove a local mean value theorem for such functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.008
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary mathematics - American Mathematical SocietySame topicMathematical and Theoretical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207