Hip Joint Contact Pressure Distribution During Pavlik Harness Treatment of an Infant Hip: A Patient-Specific Finite Element Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in infants under 6 months of age is typically treated by the Pavlik harness (PH). During successful PH treatment, a subluxed/dislocated hip is spontaneously reduced into the acetabulum, and DDH undergoes self-correction. PH treatment may fail due to avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. An improved understanding of mechanical factors accounting for the success/failure of PH treatment may arise from investigating articular cartilage contact pressure (CCP) within a hip during treatment. In this study, CCP in a cartilaginous infant hip was investigated through patient-specific finite element (FE) modeling. We simulated CCP of the hip equilibrated at 90 deg flexion at abduction angles of 40 deg, 60 deg, and 80 deg. We found that CCP was predominantly distributed on the anterior and posterior acetabulum, leaving the superior acetabulum (mainly superolateral) unloaded. From a mechanobiological perspective, hypothesizing that excessive pressure inhibits growth, our results qualitatively predicted increased obliquity and deepening of the acetabulum under such CCP distribution. This is the desired and observed therapeutic effect in successful PH treatment. The results also demonstrated increase in CCP as abduction increased. In particular, the simulation predicted large magnitude and concentrated CCP on the posterior wall of the acetabulum and the adjacent lateral femoral head at extreme abduction (80 deg). This CCP on lateral femoral head may reduce blood flow in femoral head vessels and contribute to AVN. Hence, this study provides insight into biomechanical factors potentially responsible for PH treatment success and complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".