MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794724858 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby016.441

T165. ULTRA-HIGH FIELD MORPHOMETRY IN DRUG-NAïVE FIRST EPISODE PSYCHOSIS

2018· article· en· W2794724858 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tushar Kanti Das, Kara Dempster, Michael Mackinley, Peter Jeon, Joe Gati, Jean Théberge, Ali R. Khan, Lena Palaniyappan

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosisGrey matterPsychologyVoxel-based morphometryDrug-naïveVoxelNeuroimagingSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychiatryMagnetic resonance imagingMedicineRadiologyWhite matterDrug

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural neuroimaging studies report distributed grey matter volume (GMV) deficits in drug-naïve first episode psychosis (FEP), though their relevance to symptom burden and cognitive deficits is currently unclear. When compared to studies in medicated patients and/or patients with established later-stage of psychosis, the GMV deficits reported have been limited in both spatial distribution and effect size, indicating the possibility of stage-specific progression during the clinical course of psychosis. TOPSY (Tracking Outcomes of Psychosis) is one of the first studies intending to track the neurobiological trajectory using ultra-high field (7T) imaging starting from a drug-naïve first episode state. Here, we report the initial findings from the voxel-based morphometry (VBM) of GMV. To our knowledge, this is the first VBM report from drug-naïve FEP subjects obtained using a 7T MRI acquisition. We used ultra-high field (7 Tesla) MRI in 28 patients with FEP (satisfying criterion A of DSM-5 schizophrenia) and 18 controls, to evaluate differences in the grey matter. Volume in a voxelwise manner. FEP and controls were matched for age, sex and parental socioeconomic status. Patients were recruited at an early intervention unit (PEPP, London Ontario) and had active psychotic symptoms at the time of scanning. We also obtained abbreviated PANSS (8 items) scores to index the severity of psychosis. Analysis was done using SPM12, after DARTEL based registration and segmentation but without spatial smoothing. 2-tailed voxelwise T-test with FDR correction (p=0.05, 5% rate for false positives) was used. We used multiple regression analysis to predict the scores from processing speed measure (modified Symbol Substitution Test) and the severity of Delusions and Unusual Thought Content (P1 and G9), the 2 symptoms for which most subjects sought treatment in the first place. Patients had a significant reduction in GMV in left fusiform gyrus (Hedge’s g = 1.98, T= 6.7), and increased GMV in the right precuneus (Hedge’s g = 1.63, T= 5.5) and lingual cortex (Hedge’s g = 1.19, T= 4.0). We did not find any other areas of significant GMV change. Of these 3 circumscribed GMV changes, reduced fusiform GMV was found among FEP patients with lower processing speed (ß=0.45, p=0.04), higher severity of delusions (ß=-0.43, p=0.049) and unusual thought content (ß=-0.59, p=0.01). Increased precuneus GMV was found among FEP patients with higher severity of delusions (ß=0.62, p=0.008) and unusual thought content (ß=0.50, p=0.03). Right lingual changes were not related to the severity of delusions or processing speed scores. Our findings suggest that (1) GMV deficits are minimal in drug-naïve FEP subjects, with large effect-size changes concentrated around face processing (fusiform) region (2) GMV increases co-occur with GMV reduction especially in those with most severe delusions and cognitive deficits indicating a role for compensatory plasticity. Subtle early brain structural changes appear to predict symptom burden and cognitive deficits at the time of first clinical presentation with psychosis. Focusing on treatments that manipulate the structure of fusiform cortex could potentially reduce the severity of some of the early symptoms in FEP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207