MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794898785 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby016.283

T7. PHARMACOGENETIC OF TARDIVE DYSKINESIA -- A FOLLOW-UP ON THE VALBENAZINE TARGET VMAT2/SLC18A2

2018· article· en· W2794898785 on OpenAlexaff
Clement C. Zai, Arun K. Tiwari, Daniel J. Müller, Aristotle N. Voineskos, Steven G. Potkin, Jeffrey Lieberman, Herbert Y. Meltzer, Gary Remington, James L. Kennedy

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTardive dyskinesiaDopamine transporterVesicular monoamine transporterVariable number tandem repeatAntipsychoticMedicineDopaminePharmacogeneticsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)GeneticsBioinformaticsMonoamine neurotransmitterPsychiatryInternal medicineBiologyGeneDopaminergicGenotypeReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a motor side effect that may arise after long-term treatment of antipsychotic drugs. Its etiology is not well understood, but a number of risk factors have been associated with TD. TD occurrence appears to be familial, thus suggesting a genetic component. We previously reported on an association between the SLC18A2 gene that codes for the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) that packages monoamines including dopamine from the cytoplasm into synaptic vesicles (Zai et al, 2013). In the present study, we examined the dopamine transporter gene SLC6A3 by itself and in conjunction with SLC18A2 for possible association with TD. We genotyped and analyzed the variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism in the 3’ untranslated region of the SLC6A3 gene in our European sample of 187 schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder patients assessed for TD occurrence based on the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). We also explored the interaction between the VNTR and the TD-associated SLC18A2 marker rs363224. Our preliminary analysis did not show the SLC6A3 VNTR to be associated with TD occurrence or severity. There also appeared to be no significant interaction between SLC6A3 VNTR and SLC18A2 rs363224 in TD occurrence or severity (p>0.05). Our findings did not support a major role of the dopamine transporter gene in TD risk or severity, but we will examine additional putative functional markers in this gene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207