Experimental Right Ventricular Hypertension Induces Regional β1‐Integrin–Mediated Transduction of Hypertrophic and Profibrotic Right and Left Ventricular Signaling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Development of right ventricular (RV) hypertension eventually contributes to RV and left ventricular (LV) myocardial fibrosis and dysfunction. The molecular mechanisms are not fully elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pulmonary artery banding was used to induce RV hypertension in rats in vivo. Then, we evaluated cardiac function and regional remodeling 6 weeks after pulmonary artery banding. To further elucidate mechanisms responsible for regional cardiac remodeling, we also mimicked RV hypertensive stress by cyclic mechanical stretching applied to confluent cultures of cardiac fibroblasts, isolated from the RV free wall, septal hinge points, and LV free wall. Echocardiography and catheter evaluation demonstrated that rats in the pulmonary artery banding group developed RV hypertension with leftward septal displacement, LV compression, and increased LV end-diastolic pressures. Picrosirius red staining indicated that pulmonary artery banding induced marked RV fibrosis and dysfunction, with prominent fibrosis and elastin deposition at the septal hinge points but less LV fibrosis. These changes were associated with proportionally increased expressions of integrin-β1 and profibrotic signaling proteins, including phosphorylated Smad2/3 and transforming growth factor-β1. Moreover, mechanically stretched fibroblasts also expressed significantly increased levels of α-smooth muscle actin, integrin-β1, transforming growth factor-β1, collagen I deposition, and wrinkle formation on gel assays, consistent with myofibroblast transformation. These changes were not observed in parallel cultures of mechanically stretched fibroblasts, preincubated with the integrin inhibitor (BTT-3033). CONCLUSIONS: Experimentally induced RV hypertension triggers regional RV, hinge-point, and LV integrin β1-dependent mechanotransduction signaling pathways that eventually trigger myocardial fibrosis via transforming growth factor-β1 signaling. Reduced LV fibrosis and preserved global function, despite geometrical and pressure aberrations, suggest a possible elastin-mediated protective mechanism at the septal hinge points.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".