MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2794979570 · doi:10.1101/267013

Regulation of ATR activity by the RNA polymerase II phosphatase PNUTS-PP1

2018· preprint· en· W2794979570 on OpenAlexaff
Helga B. Landsverk, Lise E. Sandquist, Gro Elise Rødland, Beáta Grallert, Laura Trinkle‐Mulcahy, Randi G. Syljuåsen

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyKreftforeningen
KeywordsKinasePhosphataseCell biologyBiologyDNA damageSignal transductionRNA polymerase IICyclin-dependent kinase 7PhosphorylationProtein kinase ABiochemistryDNAGeneGene expressionMitogen-activated protein kinase kinase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase is a key factor activated by DNA damage and replication stress. Here, we show that ATR signaling is increased in human cells after depletion of the RNAPII phosphatase PNUTS-PP1, which dephosphorylates RNAPII on Ser 5 of its carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) (pRNAPII S5). Increased ATR signaling was observed in the presence and absence of ionizing radiation or replication stress and even in G1 phase after depletion of PNUTS. Vice versa, ATR signaling was reduced, in a PNUTS dependent manner, after inhibition of the CDK7 kinase mediating pRNAPII S5. Furthermore, CDC73, a well-known RNAPII-CTD binding protein, was required for the high ATR signaling after depletion of PNUTS and co-immunoprecipitated with RNAPII and ATR. These results suggest a novel pathway involving RNAPII, PNUTS-PP1 and CDC73 in ATR signaling and give new insight into the diverse functions of ATR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→