MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795015721 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1700091

GEOCHEMISTRY AND SECONDARY ALTERATIONS OF MICROLITE FROM ELUVIAL DEPOSITS IN THE NUMBI MINING AREA, SOUTH KIVU, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO

2018· article· en· W2795015721 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jan Loun, Milan Novák, Jan Cempírek, Radek Škoda, Michaela Vašinová Galiová, Lubomı́r Prokeš, Marek Dosbaba, Renata Čopjaková

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEluviumGeochemistryGeologyDemocracyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microlite and U-enriched microlite were found in eluvium close to highly weathered granitic pegmatites actively mined as a source of tantalum ore and situated within the ~1000–900 Ma old Kibara belt unit, Numbi mining area, South Kivu province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Two examined pegmatites differ in their mineral assemblages and in the degree of fractionation: in the Mungwe pegmatite (lepidolite subtype) cassiterite, microlite-group minerals (microlite, U-enriched microlite), columbite-group minerals (columbite–tantalite), wodginite, ferrotapiolite; at the Misumari II pegmatite (beryl-columbite subtype) microlite, cassiterite, columbite–tantalite, wodginite–ferrowodginite. Both pegmatites underwent deep tropical weathering; however, the degree of hydrothermal alteration of the (Nb,Ta)-oxide minerals is rather low. Fragments of primary microlite and U-enriched microlite (the latter present only at the Mungwe pegmatite) are mostly homogeneous and compositionally uniform; locally U-enriched microlite forms outer zones of the grains. Primary microlite from the lessfractionated Misumari II pegmatite is rather homogeneous and has Ta/(Ta+Nb)=0.74–0.94 and higher Ti=0.07–0.23 apfu at the B-site compared to the Mungwe pegmatite with similar Ta/(Ta+Nb)=0.82–0.88 and low Ti. Microlite from Misumari II has higher contents of almost all trace elements (including REE) except for Li, Sb, and Pb. Primary microlite from both sites has Ca/Na close to 1, low A-site vacancy, and high F. Uranium-enriched microlite shows 0.29 apfu U, moderate A-site vacancy, and lower concentrations of F. Alteration of the U-poor microlite is very limited compared to the U-enriched microlite where radiation damage disrupted the mineral structure prior to the alteration. The altered microlite is depleted in Na and F and has high vacancy at the A-site, but the B-site population is almost identical to that of the primary microlite, as are the U concentrations. Such a composition is typical for secondary low-T alterations related to weathering. We demonstrate that the combined results from Automated Mineralogy, Electron Microprobe Analysis, and LA-ICP-MS techniques (along with the specific alteration features) can be successfully used to prove the provenance of tantalum ore by comparison with other localities where microlite is a major Ta-bearing mineral.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207