MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795034599 · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1329.2017.06005

Effect of Mind-regulating Brain-developing Moxibustion on Cognitive Function and Sleep Quality in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment

2017· article· en· W2795034599 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xinyan Jia, Tingting Tan, Dan Wang, Yuan Xu, Y. John Mei, Shangjie Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueRehabilitation Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep qualityCognitionCognitive impairmentMoxibustionBrain functionPsychologySleep (system call)MedicineCognitive psychologyAudiologyNeuroscienceComputer scienceAcupunctureAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective:To explore the effect of mind-regulating brain-developing moxibustion on cognitive function and sleep quality in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Methods:A total of 60 MCI patients were randomly assigned to the moxibustion group and control group, 30 cases in each group. The moxibustion group received moxibustion treatment of mind-regulating brain-developing, once a day, six times a week, four weeks as a course of treatment for a total of two courses of treatment; While the control group did not accept any intervention. Before and after treatment, the cognitive function of the two groups was evaluated by Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), Webster's number sign test and Webster's digital breadth test, and the quality of sleep was evaluated by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale (PSQI).Results:After two courses of treatment, the score of MoCA, number sign and digital breadth scale in moxibustion group were significantly higher than those before treatment (P<0.05), and the difference was also statistically significant between the two groups after treatment (P<0.05). The scores of ESS, ISI and PSQI in moxibustion group after two courses of treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment (P<0.05). The difference between the two groups after treatment was also significant (P<0.05). In the cognitive field, the scores of attention and delayed memory in the moxibustion group were significantly higher than those before treatment (P<0.05), and the scores of visual space and executive and delayed memory in the control group were significantly lower than those before treatment (P<0.05). There were significant differences between the two groups in the scores of visual space and executive and delayed memory after treatment (P<0.05).Conclusion:Mind-regulating brain-developing moxibustion can improve the cognitive function and sleep quality of MCI patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRehabilitation MedicineSame topicVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchFrench-language works237,207