MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795075952 · doi:10.2118/190199-ms

Reservoir Management of a Low-Salinity Flood on a Per-Pattern Basis

2018· article· en· W2795075952 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ferdinand F. Hingerl, Marco R. Thiele, Rod P. Batycky

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlberta Innovates
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringSalinityResidual oilInjectorEnhanced oil recoveryWater injection (oil production)Oil fieldEnvironmental scienceWater floodingFlood mythVolume (thermodynamics)Hydrology (agriculture)Reservoir simulationSoil scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We use a streamline-based simulator extended to reactive transport with a comprehensive chemical module to model Low Salinity (LS) flooding. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the per-pattern management of LS floods. The new reactive transport simulator with LS capabilities allows assessing the incremental oil recovery on a per-pattern basis as a function of water chemistry, mineralogy, moveable oil in place, and geological uncertainty of each injector pattern. Using a synthetic 3D field example, we show how to quantify the incremental injection efficiency (IIE)—incremental volume of oil produced with respect to standard waterflooding per volume of injected low salinity water—for each pattern. We demonstrate the importance of an uncertainty analysis of cation-exchange capacities and low-salinity oil residual saturations on predicted incremental oil recoveries. Our streamline-based reactive transport approach allows to efficiently explore the dependency of oil recovery on injection water chemistry and reservoir clay mineralogy and provides a unique tool for the management and improvement of LS floods via per-pattern incremental injection efficiencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Improved Oil Recovery ConferenceSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207