MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795260592 · doi:10.4000/paleo.3098

Un lion des cavernes (Panthera (Leo) spelaea) exploité au Dryas récent : les données du gisement du Peyrat (Saint-Rabier, Dordogne, France)

2017· article· fr· W2795260592 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Fossé, Stéphane Madelaine, Christine Oberlin, Catherine Crétin, Peggy Bonnet-Jacquement

Bibliographic record

VenuePaléo · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans les années 1960, les fouilles du gisement du Peyrat (Saint-Rabier, Dordogne) par A. Cheynier ont livré un abondant matériel lithique et osseux, rapporté au Magdalénien et à l’Azilien. La stratigraphie complexe, décrite à partir de cinq tranchées profondes, comprend une dizaine de couches d’inégale puissance dans lesquelles de très nombreux vestiges paléontologiques ont été recueillis. Ponctuellement déterminée (carnets de terrain de Cheynier) à partir de restes dentaires, la faune se compose principalement du renne et du cerf. La révision de quelques pièces paléontologiques déterminables a permis à l’un des auteurs (SM) d’identifier la présence du lion des cavernes à partir d’une colonne vertébrale sub-complète (sept vertèbres cervicales, six vertèbres thoraciques, six vertèbres lombaires), rapportée à un individu mâle. La présence de ce Félidé dans un contexte stratigraphique de l’extrême fin du Tardiglaciaire, dans un horizon culturel azilien récent, est étayée par une date radiométrique directe de 10590 ± 70 BP (SacA-38311), soit -10755/-10455 cal BC (2 σ). Cette date est, à ce jour, la plus récente jamais obtenue pour cette espèce à l’échelle eurasiatique. De plus, deux vertèbres (atlas, 12e vertèbre thoracique) présentent des traces de découpe. Le présent article dresse un bilan géo-chronologique des restes du lion des cavernes dans le Sud-Ouest de la France (nord Aquitaine – versant sud des Pyrénées) et souligne l’intérêt des gisements régionaux dans les études taphonomiques et zooarchéologiques concernant la disparition de la grande faune glaciaire. In the 1960s, excavations of the archaeological site of Le Peyrat (Saint-Rabier, Dordogne) by A. Cheynier delivered an important lithic and bone sample, related to the Magdalenian and to the Azilian cultures. A complex stratigraphy, mainly described from 5 deep trenches, includes about ten layers of uneven thickness yielding numerous paleontological remains. The macrofauna was summary identified (Cheynier’s field notes) and mainly consists of reindeer and red deer remains. A first revision of faunal remains by one of the Authors (SM) allows to identify a sub-complete vertebral column (i.e. 7 cervical vertebrae, 6 thoracic vertebrae and 6 lumbar vertebrae) belonging to a cave lion male. The presence of this large Felid in a recent Late Glacial stratigraphical level (Late Azilian), is supported by a direct radiocarbon date of 10590 ± 70 BP (SacA-38311), or 10755/-10455 cal BC (2 σ). So far, this date is the most recent ever obtained for this species in Eurasia. Furthermore, cutmarks were found on two vertebrae (atlas and 12th thoracic vertebra). The present article is a survey of the geo-chronological distribution of the cave lion in Southwestern France (from North Aquitaine up to the Spanish Pyrenees) and underlines the importance of regional sites in taphonomic and zooarchaeological studies dealing with the extinction of the large cold fauna during Late Glacial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaléoSame topicPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207