MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795311837 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23234

A cationic polymer enhanced PAC for the removal of dissolved aquatic organic carbon and organic nitrogen from surface waters

2018· article· en· W2795311837 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chuang Wang, Guocheng Zhu, Bozhi Ren, Peng Zhang, Andrew Hursthouse

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDissolved organic carbonTurbidityChemistryCationic polymerizationAdsorptionChlorideAmmonium chlorideAmmoniumEnvironmental chemistryWater treatmentPolymerColloidSurface chargePowdered activated carbon treatmentEnvironmental engineeringActivated carbonOrganic chemistryEnvironmental scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) are important components of the aquatic environment and may produce harmful disinfection by‐products through chlorination associated with water treatment processes. Therefore, it is necessary to remove them from the water. Coagulation is a cost‐effective water treatment technique as the key unit in the pretreatment of drinking water but deals with DON poorly. We present a study to investigate the enhancement of poly aluminum chloride (PAC) using a cationic polymer for the removal of both DON and DOC. The cationic dimethyl diallyl ammonium chloride (PDMDAAC) polymer was hybridized with PAC to remove DON and DOC. The results showed that the PDMDAAC increased the charge neutralization capacity of PAC and floc aggregation, thereby increasing the settling efficiency of the flocs. The PDMDAAC increased the amount of colloidal species in PAC, which was beneficial to the formation of adsorption‐bridging. With the increase of pH, a greater proportion of colloidal adsorption sites were used in the removal of DON. The DOC, DON, and turbidity removal were dependent on multiple interactions through charge neutralization, adsorption‐bridging, and floc sweeping. However, DOC and DON removal were primarily determined by adsorption‐bridging and floc sweeping, while turbidity removal was mainly dependent on charge neutralization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207