Acceleration amplification due to rotational components of near-fault earthquakes in triple concave friction pendulum base-isolated structures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies show that rotational components of earthquakes can amplify the floor acceleration in a base-isolated structure. As a result, the seismic force of nonstructural components could be significantly increased. In this paper, a simple rectangular deck with various geometrical properties mounted on triple concave friction pendulum (TCFP) bearings is examined. At first a set of three translational components from 25 near-fault ground motion records are considered. Then, three rotational components, i.e., torsional and two rocking motions are computed for each earthquake. The results of nonlinear dynamic analysis in a rectangular structure with an aspect ratio in plan equal to 3, demonstrate that the acceleration approximately intensifies 3.4 times in presence of all six ground motion components compared to three translational ones. Finally, a new formula is proposed to determine the maximum acceleration of base-isolated structure without performing the dynamic analysis due to rotational components of ground motions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it