The Trees in Emily Carr's Forest: The Book of Small as Aesthetic and Environmental Text
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume: Dans The Book of Small , les souvenirs d'enfance romances d'Emily Carr offrent un nouveau regard sur son interpretation artistique du paysage de l'Ouest canadien. Le fait qu'elle se sert d'un personnage enfant pour communiquer son approche esthetique revele qu'elle considere que l'enfant et l'artiste abordent l'experience de facons semblables. Les choix lexicaux dans ce texte demontrent les tentatives experimentales d'une enfant (ou d'un poete) vis-a-vis les liens entre la perception et le langage. Ce lexique sert non seulement a decrire mais a evoquer l'action et la qualite de cette rencontre. Summary: Emily Carr's fictionalized remembrances of her childhood experiences in The Book of Small provide insight into Carr's artistic interpretation of the West Coast landscape. Her choice to convey her artistic (aesthetic) approach to experience through a child character demonstrates her belief that the child and the artist approach experience in similar ways. The language in The Book of Small emulates a child's (or a poet's) experimentation with the links between perception and language. Language is used not simply to describe but to evoke the action and the quality of the encounter. Carr's autobiographical fiction has implications for contemporary attitudes toward childhood and toward the environment, both of which play important roles in children's literature. Renewed literary interest in this great modernist artist is shaping the Canadian aesthetic in ways that may influence how setting in children's literature is constructed and received.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".