MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795421463 · doi:10.14740/cii.v3i1.52

Delayed Presentation of Actinomycotic Intra-Abdominal Abscess Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Complicated by Empyema: Dropped Gallstone to Blame?

2018· article· en· W2795421463 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Saptarshi Biswas, Shekhar Gogna, Prem Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infection and Immunity · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicActinomycetales infections and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmpyemaSurgeryActinomycosisGallstonesCholecystectomyAbdominal painAbscessFistulaCholecystitisGeneral surgeryGallbladder

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has universally become the gold standard for symptomatic gallstone disease. However, there are two specific complications more frequent in LC compared to open cholecystectomy, i.e. injury to the common bile duct and complications from dropped gallstones. Although asymptomatic in majority of cases, adverse events are reported in between 0.08% and 0.3% of these cases. The complications due to dropped stones include abscesses around liver, spleen, diaphragm, retroperitoneum and port sites, broncholithiasis, empyema, peritonitis leading to septicemia, intestinal obstruction, thrombosis of middle colic vein, colocutaneous fistula, and bladder obstruction. Abscesses are the most common infective complications and have been reported to occur from 3.3 months to 10 years. In most cases, E. coli have been identified in abscesses and in cause of septicemia and peritonitis. There are case reports of Klebsiella , Strep. bovis and Samonella being the contaminants after dropped stones. However, actinomycosis as source of infection has rarely been described. We describe a case of an elderly patient who presented with symptoms of shortness of breath and shoulder pain, 2.5 years after cholecystectomy, in whom actinomyces species were cultured from abdominal abscesses. Only few case reports, to our knowledge, have identified actinomyces species as an etiologic agent. We also briefly describe the management of such stones. Clin Infect Immun. 2018;3(1):20-23 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cii74e

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infection and ImmunitySame topicActinomycetales infections and treatmentFrench-language works237,207