Charge density wave behavior and order-disorder in the antiferromagnetic metallic series<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The solid solution $\mathrm{Eu}{({\mathrm{Ga}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Al}}_{x})}_{4}$ was grown in single crystal form to reveal a rich variety of crystallographic, magnetic, and electronic properties that differ from the isostructural end compounds ${\mathrm{EuGa}}_{4}$ and ${\mathrm{EuAl}}_{4}$, despite the similar covalent radii and electronic configurations of Ga and Al. Here we report the onset of magnetic spin reorientation and metamagnetic transitions for $x=0--1$ evidenced by magnetization and temperature-dependent specific heat measurements. ${T}_{\mathrm{N}}$ changes nonmonotonously with $x$, and it reaches a maximum around 20 K for $x=0.50$, where the $a$ lattice parameter also shows an extreme (minimum) value. Anomalies in the temperature-dependent resistivity consistent with charge density wave behavior exist only for $x=0.50$ and 1. Density functional theory calculations show increased polarization between the Ga-Al covalent bonds in the $x=0.50$ structure compared to the end compounds, such that crystallographic order and chemical pressure are proposed as the causes of the charge density wave behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.758 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".