Views of the students of the selected non-government medical colleges of Bangladesh regarding community based medical education (CBME) practice in their institutes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in 2015, objective was to find out the views of the students of 3rd phase of non-government medical colleges regarding the community based medical education practice in their colleges. Data was collected from 507 students of 12 medical colleges by using self-administered structured questionnaires. Among the students 223 were from the Dhaka city and 284 from outside the Dhaka city. Almost 90 percent of the students mentioned that their institutes conducted RFST and Day Visit programe, and duration of Residential Field Site Training (RFST) programe ranges from 1-30 days with mean 9.45 and SD ± 6.34. Most of the students mentioned that they did not stay night in the community. About sixty percent of the students were satisfied with the RFST programe . During RFST programme most of the students 387 (77.7) visited upazila health complex, and 296 (59.4) participated in the conduction of survey. Most of the students visited institute of public health, EPI head quarter and MCH centre or clinic during Day visit programme. Most of them mentioned problems faced in RFST programme as: lack of transport support; lack own accommodation facilities; lack of security; and lack of cooperation from the authority of the different organizations. Suggestions given by the students for the further improvement of the practice of CBME programme in their institutes were mainly : realization of importance of CBME by college authority , teachers and students; College authority should be well motivated for conducting the CBME programme activities in their institute; College authority should build dormitories for the permanent solution of the residential problems and College authority should have the required amount of transport for this activities.Bangladesh Journal of Medical Education Vol.9(1) 2018: 21-25
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".