MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795584931 · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-3896

Successful Liver Transplants for Liver Failure Associated With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency

2018· article· en· W2795584931 on OpenAlexaff
Marie‐Eve Chartier, Lara Hart, Massimiliano Paganelli, Najma Ahmed, Marc Bilodeau, Fernando Álvarez

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's HospitalUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePyruvate kinase deficiencySplenectomyHemolysisNeonatal cholestasisUnconjugated hyperbilirubinemiaLiver transplantationHemolytic anemiaLiver function testsAnemiaInternal medicineLiver failureCholestasisLiver functionGastroenterologyBilirubinPyruvate kinaseTransplantationSpleenMetabolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pyruvate kinase deficiency (PKD) is the most common cause of congenital nonspherocytic chronic hemolytic anemia, and patients normally present with mild to severe anemia, unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, and splenomegaly. Only a few reports of PKD have documented its association with severe, progressive liver failure. In all those cases, the patients died before liver transplant (LT) or immediately after transplant. We report 2 case patients with liver failure associated with PKD who successfully underwent LT and splenectomy: an infant who presented with neonatal cholestasis and a young adult with a severe form of PKD and having been transfusion dependent during childhood. After transplant, both patients have normal liver function test results and have considerably decreased their need for blood transfusion despite ongoing, mild hemolysis. We suggest that PKD can lead to severe liver dysfunction and that LT and splenectomy can be life-saving procedures in such cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICSSame topicErythrocyte Function and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207