MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795588244

"Perhaps nobody has told you why the English are called Sahibs in India": Sara Jeannette Duncan's Imperialism for Children

2007· article· en· W2795588244 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cecily Devereux

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Children's Literature / Littérature canadienne pour la jeunesse · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesIdeologyArtEmpireArt historyHistoryArchaeologyLawPoliticsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resume: Sara Jeannette Duncan, auteure de recits a la gloire de l'empire britannique, a compose un seul roman pour la jeunesse, The Story of Sonny Sahib . Peu connue, cette œuvre publiee en 1894 a ete reeditee a maintes reprises dans les premieres decennies du vingtieme siecle. Cecily Devereux analyse les manifestations de l'ideologie imperialiste dans ce recit, qui, bien qu'il ne soit pas entierement conventionnel, respecte les valeurs que la romanciere a exprimees dans ses autres romans que l'on retrouve dans le vaste corpus des ouvrages didactiques et imperialistes pour la jeunesse de l'ere victorienne. Summary: Anglo-imperial English-Canadian writer Sara Jeannette Duncan wrote only one children's book: The Story of Sonny Sahib was published in 1894 and, while it is not a well-known text of imperial children's literature, it did remain in print until well into the twentieth century. This paper considers the imperial and ideological work of this novel and begins to question this work in terms of the novel's relation to Duncan's other fiction and to imperial children's fiction in general: The Story of Sonny Sahib is not a formulaic novel, but it does align itself in important ways with both Duncan's grown-up fiction and the nineteenth-century proliferation of didactic and imperial writing for young people.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Children's Literature / Littérature canadienne pour la jeunesseSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207