MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795598845 · doi:10.1080/03610470.2017.1402582

Comparisons of Modern U. S. and Canadian Malting Barley Cultivars with Those from Pre-Prohibition: III. Wort Sugar Production during Mashing

2018· article· en· W2795598845 on OpenAlex
Stanley H. Duke, Cynthia A. Henson, Harold E. Bockelman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAmerican Malting Barley Association
KeywordsMashingMaltotrioseMaltoseCultivarFructoseSucroseSugarFood scienceAlpha-glucosidaseBiologyChemistryHorticultureBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wort sugars produced during Congress mashing of pre-Prohibition and modern barley genotypes were compared. Four of five modern cultivars were higher (P < 0.0001) in wort glucose production than six pre-Prohibition cultivars. Mean wort glucose levels of the five modern cultivars were higher (P values from 0.0002 to 0.0021) than that of the pre-Prohibition barleys. In contrast, maltose production was variable and there were no significant differences in mean levels in modern versus pre-Prohibition barley worts, although Manchuria (pre-Prohibition) and Tradition (modern) produced higher (P < 0.0001) levels than other genotypes. Wort maltotriose levels were also quite variable among genotypes, although were higher (P < 0.0001) in Harrington (modern) worts than all others at the end of mashing. By the end of mashing, pre-Prohibition and modern genotypes did not statistically differ in their mean levels of maltotriose (P = 0.514). Glucose equivalents from fermentable sugars (i.e., total glucose from glucose plus hydrolysis of maltose and maltotriose) followed almost an identical pattern as that for maltose. Levels of maltotetraose through maltoheptaose were variable in both pre-Prohibition and modern genotypes throughout mashing. However, these maltodextrins usually decreased rapidly in modern cultivars while they increased or decreased more slowly in pre-Prohibition genotypes. In general, maltotetraose through maltoheptaose were higher (P < 0.0001) in Hanna and Hannchen (pre-Prohibition) worts than in other worts. Sucrose levels were relatively constant during mashing of most pre-Prohibition and modern genotypes. Fructose levels increased throughout mashing for all genotypes. Mean wort fructose levels of modern barley genotypes were significantly higher than those for pre-Prohibition genotypes during most of mashing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it