Traditional Fantasy and the Nineteenth-Century Canadian Short Adventure Tale: Working-Class Tales for Youth in Nineteenth-Century Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume: Cette dissertation est la troisieme dans une serie qui cherche a examiner la courte fiction d'aventure publiee par et a propos du Canada et les Canadiens dans les periodiques pour les jeunes aux Etats-Unis et en Grande Bretagne entre les annees 1870 et 1914. Pendant que les histoires plus developpees de cette collection prennent leur place a cote des histoires courtes parvenant du monde entier, les contes plus simples demontrent des qualites pre-litteraires trouvees dans toute litterature folklorique. Les medias de la presse ont simplement garde les variantes pendant une periode ou la tradition orale etait inoperable au Canada du a la proximite et a l'augmentation du savoir lire. L'etude suivante cherche a examiner ces variantes contre les modeles de contes folkloriques quant a la scene, la caracterisation, l'action et le theme, et en contexte avec les categories de litterature folklorique telles que les fables, les contes et les contes de fee. Summary: This essay, the third in a series, examines short adventure fiction by and about Canada and Canadians published in popular U.S. and British periodicals for youth between 1870 and 1914. While the more fully-developed stories in this group rightly take their place alongside short stories the world over, the simpler tales demonstrate pre-literate qualities found in all folk literature. Print media simply saved the variants at a time when the oral tradition was inoperable in Canada due to proximity and increased literacy. The following study examines these variants against folktale patterns in terms of setting, characterization, plot, theme, and in context with well-known categories of folk literature such as fables, noodlehead tales, tall tales, and fairy tales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".