An Efficient I/O Architecture for RAM-Based Content-Addressable Memory on FPGA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the impressive search rate of one key per clock cycle, the update stage of a random-access-memory-based content-addressable-memory (RAM-based CAM) always suffers high latency. Two primary causes of such latency include: 1) the compulsory erasing stage along with the writing stage and 2) the major difference in data width between the RAM-based CAM (e.g., 8-bit width) and the modern systems (e.g., 256-bit width). This brief, therefore, proposes an efficient input/output (I/O) architecture of RAM-based binary CAM (RCAM) for low-latency update. To achieve this goal, three techniques, namely centralized erase RAM, bit-sliced, and hierarchical-partitioning, are proposed to eliminate the latency of the erasing stage, as well as to allow RCAM to exploit the bandwidth of modern systems effectively. Several RCAMs, whose data width ranges from 8 bits to 64 bits, were integrated into a 256-bit system for the evaluation. The experimental results in an Intel Arria V 5ASTFD5 field-programmable gate array prove that, at 100 MHz, the proposed designs achieve at least 9.6 times higher I/O efficiency as compared to the traditional RCAM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".