Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume: L'on croit que Madame Diana Bayley (? - 1868), auteur de Henry; or, the Juvenile Traveller (1836), est la premiere personne au Canada a avoir ecrit des œuvres pour la jeunesse. Epouse d'un administrateur britannique, elle s'est etablie au Bas-Canada en 1832 et a publie, de 1833 a 1834, des recits dans The Montreal Museum . Elle est la mere ou la belle-mere de Frederick W.N. Bayley, prolifique auteur pour la jeunesse de la seconde moitie du dix-neuvieme siecle; apres son retour en Angleterre, elle a poursuivi sa carriere de romanciere. L'article explique son absence du Dictionnaire biographique du Canada. Summary: Mrs. Diana Bayley (b.?, d. 1868), author of Henry; or, the Juvenile Traveller (1836), is believed to be the first resident of Canada to write for children. The wife of an English administrator, Assistant Commissary-General Henry Addington Bayley, Diana Bayley came to Lower Canada in 1832. She wrote for a juvenile periodical, The Montreal Museum , from 1833 to 1834, when it ceased publication. She is either the mother or the step-mother of Frederick W.N. Bayley, later a prolific writer for children. Mrs. Bayley wrote other novels after returning to England. This article explains how she got dropped from the Dictionary of Canadian Biography , due to uncertainty over her death date.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.078 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".