MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795812228 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.7533

2.  Immunolocalization of Cystatin‐Related Epididymal Spermatogenic (CRES) Protein in Mouse Spermatozoa

2017· article· en· W2795812228 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marvin Ferrer

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpermSpermatidEpididymisSpermatogenesisAcrosomeBiologyCell biologyAndrologyImmunogold labellingAnatomyEndocrinologyUltrastructureGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CRES is an inhibitor of a specific member of an enzyme family called serine proteases. It is thus thought to play a role in enzymatic regulation. It has been shown to be expressed only in the testes, epididymis, sperm, and gonadotropic cells of the anterior pituitary gland. Localization of CRES in sperm is an important step in determining its role within sperm. Previous studies have shown CRES to be localized in the mouse acrosomal cap: a vesicle on the tip of the sperm head which releases its contents upon initial sperm‐egg contact. The present study shows that developmental analysis of spermatogenesis via immunohistochemistry is incompatible with the conclusion that CRES is localized in the acrosomal cap. CRES expression begins in the elongating spermatid stage of sperm development; by this point, the acrosomal cap has been completed and it has never been shown that further additions to it can occur. Western blot and immunogold electron microscopy shows that CRES is localized in the sperm tail. It is also possible that further CRES is placed on the outer sperm membranes on the head as it travels through the epididymis, which is a part of the male reproductive tract.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207